What is the appropriate action if soil cannot be sampled due to extreme conditions?

In situations where soil sampling is not feasible due to extreme conditions, resorting to estimating contamination levels mathematically is not a reliable approach. Mathematics alone cannot substitute for empirical data collected from the actual site, especially when assessing environmental contamination. The determination of contamination levels requires direct measurement and analysis of soil, which would accurately reflect the conditions present at the site.

The correct course of action involves utilizing alternative sampling techniques, which can facilitate the collection of needed data even when conventional methods are hindered. This might include techniques such as surface sampling, remote sensing, or using hand augers in less invasive ways, allowing for data gathering without the need for optimal soil conditions. This method ensures that the assessment of contamination can continue even under adverse circumstances, maintaining the integrity of the environmental monitoring process and ensuring timely decisions can be made regarding remediation or further investigation.

Thus, employing alternative sampling techniques is essential when faced with the inability to directly sample soil, ensuring both safety and accuracy in environmental assessments.